How we research

Evidence before recommendations

Our method is designed for fast-changing platform and payment information.

1. Define the exact question

We separate issues that are often incorrectly merged: account registration, monetization eligibility, payout method availability, holding money, card issuance, withdrawal and merchant acceptance.

2. Find the controlling source

We prioritize official help centers, product terms, regulator pages and signed-in account instructions. Search snippets and third-party summaries are not treated as final evidence.

3. Record the date and scope

Country lists and platform rules can change. We record when a source was checked and avoid extending a narrow claim beyond what the source supports.

4. Cross-check conflicts

Where two official pages describe different timelines or product scopes, we explain the difference rather than selecting the more convenient number.

5. Separate experience from policy

Local mail handling, payment friction and creator reports can add valuable context. They are labeled as experience or practical preparation, not universal platform policy.

6. Use cautious recommendations

Account-specific approval belongs to the platform or provider. We do not guarantee eligibility, verification, delivery, card issuance or payment success.

7. Review calculators

Calculator assumptions are shown beside the tool. Users enter changeable fees rather than relying on hidden or promotional default rates.

Source hierarchy: signed-in account instruction → official platform/provider documentation → regulator/government source → documented first-hand evidence → reputable secondary reporting → community report.

Method last updated July 15, 2026.